Dante’s Political Teaching in Purgatorio


Dante painting
Dante painting

Dante’s Philosophical Life: Politics and Human Wisdom in Purgatorio

 

JMC fellow Paul Stern’s new study of Dante’s Political teaching in Purgatoria offers a fresh analysis of Dante’s masterpiece. Stern joined Jeffrey Church on the Political Theory Review to discuss his research on Dante’s political thought.

Listen to the podcast episode below:

 

 

About the book

When political theorists teach the history of political philosophy, they typically skip from the ancient Greeks and Cicero to Augustine in the fifth century and Thomas Aquinas in the thirteenth, and then on to the origins of modernity with Machiavelli and beyond. Paul Stern aims to change this settled narrative and makes a powerful case for treating Dante Alighieri, arguably the greatest poet of medieval Christendom, as a political philosopher of the first rank.

In Dante’s Philosophical Life, Stern argues that Purgatorio’s depiction of the ascent to Earthly Paradise, that is, the summit of Mount Purgatory, was intended to give instruction on how to live the philosophic life, understood in its classical form as “love of wisdom.” As an object of love, however, wisdom must be sought by the human soul, rather than possessed. But before the search can be undertaken, the soul needs to consider from where it begins: its nature and its good. In Stern’s interpretation of Purgatorio, Dante’s intense concern for political life follows from this need, for it is law that supplies the notions of good that shape the soul’s understanding and it is law, especially its limits, that provides the most evident display of the soul’s enduring hopes.

According to Stern, Dante places inquiry regarding human nature and its good at the heart of philosophic investigation, thereby rehabilitating the highest form of reasoned judgment or prudence. Philosophy thus understood is neither a body of doctrines easily situated in a Christian framework nor a set of intellectual tools best used for predetermined theological ends, but a way of life. Stern’s claim that Dante was arguing for prudence against dogmatisms of every kind addresses a question of contemporary concern: whether reason can guide a life.

Purchase the book here >>

 


 

Paul SternPaul Stern is a JMC fellow and Professor of Politics at Ursinus College. His research and teaching focus on political philosophy, the philosophy of science, and classical political thought. His recent works are Dante’s Philosophical Life: Politics and Human Wisdom in “Purgatorio” (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2018), “Philosophy and Poetry in Michael Davis’s The Soul of the Greeks” in Writing the Poetic Soul of Philosophy (South Bend, IN: St. Augustine’s Press, 2017), and Socrates’ Protagoras, ” an invited review of Robert C. Bartlett’s Sophistry and Political Philosophy: Protagoras’ Challenge to Socrates in The Review of Politics (Winter, 2018). He received his MA and PhD from the University of Chicago and his BA from Michigan State University.

Learn more about Paul Stern >>

 

 


 

Facebook iconTwitter iconFollow us on Facebook and Twitter for updates about lectures, publications, podcasts, and events related to American political thought, United States history, and the Western tradition!

 


 

Want to help the Jack Miller Center transform higher education? Donate today.